Home / Maldives Spa Ban: Ulterior Motives Perhaps?

Maldives Spa Ban: Ulterior Motives Perhaps?

Maldives spas.The Maldives government has ordered the closure of all spas and massage parlors in its luxury resorts, almost one week after massive protests from Islamist opposition parties demanding an end to “anti-Islamic” practices, reports AFP.

A spokesperson from the president’s office revealed that the government had announced the move after bowing to pressure from “opposition-led religious protests” which were held in the country’s capital city Male last week.

AFP reports that officials from the Maldives’ tourism ministry issued a notice to all resorts throughout the 1,192 island archipelago, ordering them to close down their spas. However, the official, who refused to be named, said he could not confirm if all spas in the country had yet closed.

A small archipelago in the Indian Ocean, the Maldives are a popular getaway for thousands of tourists from across the globe. The islands are home to numerous high-end, luxury resorts that attract well-heeled celebrities, honeymooners and families each year.

Tourism is a vital industry for the small nation, acting as both a major foreign exchange earner and also a source of employment for thousands of Maldivians. The Indian Ocean country counted over 850,000 tourists in 2011, attracted to its crystal clear lagoons, its pristine beaches, corals and reefs.

Even so, the government appears to have caved in to the demands of hard-line protestors, just days after President Mohamed Nasheed had appealed to Maldivians to adopt a more tolerant form of Islam.

President Nasheed had reportedly urged the country’s 330,000 citizens to adhere to the traditional ”liberal” form of Islam that has long been practiced in the country and reject extremism.

However, the president’s appeal seems to have fallen on deaf ears, as just days later thousands of Islamists took to the streets of Male, demanding that the government put an end to what it termed “anti-Islamic” activities. The protestors, whom AFP claims were apparently led by the opposition Adhallat (Justice) Party amongst others, accused government officials of compromising Islamic principles and demanded that the government adopt Sharia Law.

They urged the government to ban the sale of alcohol throughout the country, close down brothels which were said to be operating under the guise of spas and massage parlors, and destroy a number of monuments donated to the Maldives at last month’s South Asian summit, claiming that these are false idols.

A recent plan to allow direct flights into the country from Israel was also heavily criticized by the protestors.

Maldives girl. Interestingly, AFP report that the individuals likely to be hardest hit by the ban on spas could be some of the protestors themselves, prompting some to speculate an ulterior motive to the government’s move. A number of opposition politicians have large stakes in the country’s tourist industry, including Gasim Ibrahim of the Jumhoory Party, who is reported to own five luxury resorts.

According to one key opposition party, the Progressive Party of Maldives (PPM.L), led by ex-President Maumoon Abdul Gayoom, the spa closure is actually designed to hurt leisure business owned by members of the opposition.

A party spokesman told Reuters that they had never asked for a ban on the country’s spas. Instead, he claimed that the protestors had only asked that certain massage parlors were banned, as well as the sale of liquor, in order to prevent prostitution and the use of drugs and alcohol amongst the local population.

“President Nasheed is misusing our demands to take revenge on the opposition by imposing bans on our resorts,” the spokesperson claimed.

“We wanted the liquor and massage clinics banned in inhabited islands to prevent prostitution and spread of drugs and alcohol to locals. Nasheed is misusing the demands to take revenge by imposing the ban on resorts owned by the opposition members.”

Predictably, tourism chiefs in the country have criticized the government’s move, according to a later report. Maldives Association of Tourism Industry (MATI) chief Sim Ibrahim told AFP that the ban was not at all helpful for the country’s tourism industry and bad for the nation’s image.

The report revealed that MATI had already filed a court action, claiming that the ban on spas is a violation of lease agreements between resort owners and the government, as well as investor’s constitutional rights.

According to Ibrahim, more than 100 resorts had already complied with the directive, yet they hoped that they would soon be able to overturn the ban.

Maldives spa lady courtesy © Leonid & Anna Dedukh – Fotolia.com


  1. Maldivian says

    This is a political stunt of a dictatorial government. Maldives does not have sex tourism. As there are some brothels being operated under the dubious name of “spas” and “traditional medicine” in locally inhabited islands, all opposition parties in a political rally called for prohibition of this to the government. One of these opposition parties is lead by a local resort operator. The government went on to punish him by first banning airline operation owned by the resort operator followed by closing resort spas of his five resorts only. When he appealed successfully against this and when the judiciary issued a statement that the government cannot punish individuals without evidence the government issued a statement stating that they are following public calls to stop spas. This was followed by issuing a statement to all the resorts to close their spas and health clubs. Lawyers have said that this cannot be done and such politically motivated actions of the government looses investor confidence. Now the government is saying that IF the locals agree to an Israeli airline to start operating to the country then the government will consider allowing spas in the resorts. This is just another political stunt from the same people who called for Westerners to boycott tourism when they were in the opposition. Tourism industry is the victim of an authoritarian regime. Unfortunately locals are paying for bringing an activist to the government. As the local saying goes, we have given a sword to a madman. Now we have to suffer the consequences.